Difference between revisions of "Feature validity"

From LearnLab
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
A student has acquired a knowledge component (KC) with high feature validity when the retrieval features of that knowledge component are all relevant and none are irrelevant.  Through the learning process of [[refinement]] a learner may modify an existing KC to produce a new one with higher feature validity.
 
A student has acquired a knowledge component (KC) with high feature validity when the retrieval features of that knowledge component are all relevant and none are irrelevant.  Through the learning process of [[refinement]] a learner may modify an existing KC to produce a new one with higher feature validity.
  
Feature validity is a generalization of the standard concept of cue validity.  Cues are usually understood to be perceptual or at least rapidly computed (MacWhinney & Bates, 1989).  The term “features” includes cues as well as higher level properties, such as those used by experts but not novices (Chi, Glaser & Feltovitch, 1981).  
+
Feature validity is a generalization of the standard concept of cue validity.  Cues are usually understood to be perceptual or at least rapidly computed (MacWhinney & Bates, 1989).  The term “features” includes cues as well as higher level properties, such as those used by experts but not novices (Chi, Feltovitch, & Glaser, 1981).  
  
See the Booth page in Coordinative Learning for one example.
+
See the [[Booth]] page for examples of knowledge components with different levels of feature validity.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== References ===
 +
* Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
 +
* MacWhinney & Bates (1989).

Revision as of 17:00, 3 January 2008


The feature validity of a knowledge component measures how well the features associated with the mental representation of the knowledge component match the features present during all situations where the component should be recalled.

A student has acquired a knowledge component (KC) with high feature validity when the retrieval features of that knowledge component are all relevant and none are irrelevant. Through the learning process of refinement a learner may modify an existing KC to produce a new one with higher feature validity.

Feature validity is a generalization of the standard concept of cue validity. Cues are usually understood to be perceptual or at least rapidly computed (MacWhinney & Bates, 1989). The term “features” includes cues as well as higher level properties, such as those used by experts but not novices (Chi, Feltovitch, & Glaser, 1981).

See the Booth page for examples of knowledge components with different levels of feature validity.


References

  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
  • MacWhinney & Bates (1989).