Difference between revisions of "Talk:Visual Representations in Science Learning"

From LearnLab
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: This page is very impressive! Some suggested improvements: - References in Background section are missing from the Reference section. - The relevant findings sections could make relevan...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
This page is very impressive!   
 
This page is very impressive!   
 
Some suggested improvements:
 
Some suggested improvements:
- References in Background section are missing from the Reference section.
+
* Include the overall means and statistical results for in vivo study #4.  
- The relevant findings sections could make relevant references to Davenport papers in the Reference section.
+
* The relevant findings sections could make relevant references to Davenport papers in the Reference section.
- "Coordination" and "integration" seem to be used interchangeably. Are they different or can they be collapsed?
+
* References in Background section are missing from the Reference section.
 +
* "Coordination" and "integration" seem to be used interchangeably. Are they different or can they be collapsed?

Latest revision as of 06:44, 23 April 2008

This page is very impressive! Some suggested improvements:

  • Include the overall means and statistical results for in vivo study #4.
  • The relevant findings sections could make relevant references to Davenport papers in the Reference section.
  • References in Background section are missing from the Reference section.
  • "Coordination" and "integration" seem to be used interchangeably. Are they different or can they be collapsed?